Showing posts with label Susan Katz Keating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Susan Katz Keating. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2011

OP/ED: Lara Logan is a very lucky woman

  • CBS News Correspondent Lara Logan in Tahrir Square moments before she was attacked on Feb. 11, 2011.
    • CBS News Correspondent Lara Logan in Tahrir Square moments before she was attacked on Feb. 11, 2011. (CBS)
I do not know Lara Logan, and I must admit that, prior to her becoming the story out of Egypt's current upheavals, rather than reporting other news stories, I had never heard of her. Be that as it may, I watched as the 24/7 mainstream media variously declared that CBS's 'chief foreign correspondent' was 'brutally attacked,' 'sexually assaulted,' and/or 'raped.'

Since none of us were there in that alley with Lara Logan, we cannot know the extent of the attack, but that has not stopped the cacophony from various pundits and academics - 'experts' all - expounding on the story. I have tried to avoid writing about it myself. However, I am choosing to add my 2 cents' worth to the media noise today because, unlike 90% of those with uninformed opinions they are all to willing to share, I DO have authority to speak on this subject.

No matter what anyone calls what happened to Logan, I have absolutely no doubt that she thought she was going to die that day in Egypt. I guarantee it. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

Lara Logan lived, and that IS a blessing, although I have no way of knowing if Logan herself has come to that conclusion yet. According to stories in the immediate aftermath of that night in an Egyptian alley way, apparently Logan was rescued by a crowd of Egyptian women - 'sisters,' if you will. Logan is a very lucky woman. For many survivors, there is NO rescue from either an isolated rape/sexual assault by an unknown stranger(s), or from an ongoing, daily intimidation of sexual abuse by a relative or close friend.

Logan is a very lucky woman for other reasons. Unlike the Egyptian women who rescued her, Logan was able to take a private jet and leave the country where this happened. I guarantee that within that crowd of female saviours, more than a few of them are/have been victims of ongoing sexual assaults, brutal attacks, within their own communities. It is well documented in many places, of the daily barrage of assault, intimidation, that women in Egypt, Iran, and other middle eastern countries contend with, just because they are female. For these women there is no escape. With very little research, one can find horrific stories of women's gender being used against them. Many, many reports have been written over the years of rape being used as a weapon of war around the world. It goes on as I write this, as you read this, and yet still more studies are called for, more reports written, more finger-wagging and vocal condemnation (maybe,) before any actions are taken to stop the systemic abuse of half of the world's population, based merely on their gender.

Don't believe me? Take a look:


Egyptian Women Silently Endure Sexual Harassment, Movie Reveals



Egyptian singer and actress Boshra

Egyptian singer and actress Boshra in "678." The movie depicts women suffering from sexual harassment during everyday life in Egypt.

Source: Mohamed Diab via Bloomberg


The poster for the film "678"

The poster for the film "678" shows the three female stars Nahed, Boshra and Nelly Karim. The movie depicts women suffering from sexual harassment during everyday life in Egypt.

Source: Mohamed Diab via Bloomberg


A man on a crammed public bus presses his pelvis against the body of a veiled woman. Another grabs her bottom as she walks on the street in broad daylight.

Compared to the deadly clashes that have erupted in Egypt’s streets and the change of government, these episodes may seem secondary. Yet they have been commonplace for decades. Director Mohamed Diab has chosen to include them in a movie that portrays three women enduring sexual harassment, with the social pressure and silence that go with it.

“What we want to say through this movie is that you should speak out and hold your head up high,” Diab said in an interview in Cairo. “There’s nothing to be ashamed of, so do say that you have been sexually harassed.”

Titled “678” -- the Cairo bus line that one of the female protagonists rides every day -- the film is showing in theaters at a time when attention is elsewhere. An increasing number of women joined protests in recent weeks.

“I was convinced that it should be a man who talks about this subject,” said the director. “Women’s organizations in the Arab world do not have credibility, and are believed to be biased.”

[...]

“One of the best reactions I encountered was at the movie theater,” said Diab. “When the film screening ended, men made space for women to let them pass -- whether out of fear or respect -- instead of going out in a stampede.”(Read more here) [Yes, emphasis mine]


From the reports I was unable to avoid, Logan was set upon by an unruly mob, a stampede if you will. Whilst I would be the very last to say that she brought what happened upon herself - as we all heard some commentators do - I have to ask: What the hell was she, and her colleagues, thinking? From the pictures and reports played around the world, it appears that Logan found herself in the middle of the tense, aggressive, excited crowd in Tahrir Square. Logan is apparently 'chief foreign correspondent' which suggests to me that she was no naive rookie reporter who had only previously reported on her local City Hall meetings. Yes, I truly do understand the adrenaline rush of being present as history is being made, deadlines to produce something newsworthy, the thrill of an exclusive scoop, and yes, she was just doing her job. However, even naive students of human behaviour - who have maybe read a couple of Psych 101 textbooks - KNOW that a whole different, usually uncontrollable, dynamic comes into play, when the mob rules.

Lara Logan was very lucky that doing her job did not cost her her life, as it has for other journalists globally, both women and men. Susan Katz Keating wrote an insightful column on reporting as a dangerous business, when Logan's story hit the airwaves:

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Reporting Real News: It Can Be a Killer

Reporting from the war zone
There's been a fair amount of chatter amongst journalists the past couple weeks, discussing the dangers of hot zone reporting. Rightly so. It's been a tough run lately for the Fourth Estate. Several prominent journalists have been attacked, some brutally, while attempting to report the news.

The public discourse has taken on a breathless undertone: We Live Such Thrilling Lives! Not quite the level of a corner-bar TINS session, but awash in bravado. Journalists now are eagerly interviewing other journos about their experiences. The latest is not for Editor & Publisher nor Mediabistro, but for... the spiffy men's style mag, GQ.

To paraphrase the tone of GQ's "How I Survived an Attack in Cairo:"

- Greg, what was it like when the mob set upon you with machetes?
- Terrible, Taimur. I feared being hacked to pieces.


Throws off a fair amount of swashbuckle, no?


Privately, though, I'm hearing fear and shock. I understand. The fear, at least. This is scary stuff. But I question the degree of shock. When did anyone get the notion that journalists could roam unharmed in a hot zone? Here within the U.S., we have a widespread social compact exempting reporters, especially t.v. crews, from harm. Drug dealers, gun runners, and mobsters are among the "scary set" who have told their stories to American journalists, and have kept a hands-off policy so that the scribes might to live to tell the tale. But America is not the world. And we know that...


Susan (a journalist/blogger, and yes a friend of mine) has much more, and it is a must read here. As Susan says, 'America is not the world,' and it boggles my mind that Logan's network, or any other for that matter, would not be aware of the dangers out there for ANY journalist.

There has been much written about journalists who do admirable, important work around the world, even as they might be in fear for their personal safety, and their lives in danger.

Terry Gould, a Canadian investigative journalist, wrote a book about five journalists, none American, who paid dearly for their own pursuit of truth.

I read this book a few months back, and it should be mandatory reading in every journalism school, and every network newsroom. Perhaps then the US msm, specifically, will put more forethought into what safety precautions need to be put in place before journalists 'parachute' in to danger zones.

Truth of the matter is that as western journalists, we may be forgiven for holding on to the myth perpetuated by the American 'media star' phenomenon. Anybody who watches the evening news, knows well who the 'superstars' of the major networks are. Coiffed and primped, they add to the 'news as entertainment' syndrome which, from where I sit, is what US news broadcasts have become. Paid exorbitant salaries, and feted as celebrities, rather than tradesmen/women of their craft of journalism, it seems obvious that these same reporters would feel invincible when they fly into war-zones, danger zones. For female journalists this can be an especially dangerous mindset. For an overview of this, got to the BBC here.

Last year two Canadian reporters (both females) learned, in the most violent of ways, that the rest of the world has no respect for their nationality OR their genders, as they both embedded - at different times - with Canadian troops in Afghanistan. One, Melissa Fung, a CBC reporter, was kidnapped by the Taleban and kept captive for weeks. I have heard interviews with her, given after she returned home and as she had become the story.

Mellissa Fung discusses her abduction in Afghanistan

Broadcast Date: Nov. 13, 2008

It has become all too common a moment, and one that war correspondents have come to fear: you're suddenly surrounded by heavily armed masked men, shouting orders in a language you don't understand. You're bundled into a car and sped off to captivity and possible death. CBC-TV reporter Mellissa Fung joined the small but growing number of reporters kidnapped in war-torn Afghanistan when she was abducted in October 2008. After 28 days of captivity, sometimes in chains, Fung was freed. (Go here for her story and video interview she did as the basis of a documentary.)


Go here or here for background on that. Like Logan, Fung was lucky. She lived. Another Canadian female reporter, Michelle Lang, was not so lucky.

5 Canadians killed in Afghanistan

Roadside bomb hits armoured vehicle

Last Updated: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 | 11:17 PM ET


Reporter Michelle Lang of the Calgary Herald was among five Canadians killed by a bomb in Afghanistan on Wednesday.

Reporter Michelle Lang of the Calgary Herald was among five Canadians killed by a bomb in Afghanistan on Wednesday.
(Photo from Facebook)


[...] "The journalist was travelling with them to tell the story of what Canada's soldiers are doing in Afghanistan," [BG Menard] said.

[...]

"While not regularly the subject of news, those journalists who risk their lives reporting alongside the men and women of the Canadian Forces in one of the most dangerous regions in the world should not be forgotten," said spokesman Dimitri Soudas.

The journalist was identified as Michelle Lang of the Calgary Herald. Lang, 34, grew up in Vancouver and was a respected health reporter for the Herald, winning a National Newspaper Award in 2008 for best beat reporting. She had also worked in Regina, Moose Jaw and Prince George....(More here)


I read in a few places Lang described as a 'sweetheart,' and an award winning journalist, for stories she wrote within Canada.

The truth of the matter is, that once a western journalist steps off their home shores to cover dangerous places globally, it no longer matters how sweet they are, or what awards they may have earned at home. The people, and events, they have gone to cover don't care. Wrapped up in their own history-making cataclysms, the locals don't see the 'superstar.' Especially in countries where women are treated as second class citizens, it should be understandable to even the most detached news organisations that sending ANY journalist on assignment overseas is potentially sending them into harm's way.

What happened to Lara Logan was awful, but I see it as an opportunity both for her, and her colleagues, and bosses. Unlike some of the other women around the world who toil daily to tell the important stories, (and you can meet 10 other international female journalists here) people like Logan are lucky to have the full weight of the resources of a major American news network behind them.

I heard an academic recently (yes, a woman) discussing what training should be in place pre-assignment for all journalists, and surely, this is commonsense. Just as a firefighter doesn't go in to battle a fire without training, tools, and knowledge to ensure their safety as they do their jobs, so too should journalists be given training, tools and knowledge that ensures their safety. They should be given some kind of education on the cultural mores of the areas they are entering. In Logan's example, perhaps being aware, ahead of time, of how women are treated in Egypt every.single.day would have made her - and her colleagues - more cautious about being engulfed within that predominantly male crowd. I do know that within my own journalism training, we focused solely on how to write. Period. What happened to Lara Logan should be a wake-up call to all journalists and their bosses. Yes, I know even major news groups are suffering financial losses, but unless they are prepared to send their journalists off to the most dangerous spots on earth armed with the proper tools (security guards, maybe?) they should keep their journalists at home.

I am not suggesting for one minute - again, as others have - that Logan's clothing sent the wrong message to the men around her. No 'if she hadn't been dressed provocatively it wouldn't have happened' from me. In my own dark alley many years ago, a maximum of an inch of my face was all that showed. But yes, the disgusting myth of 'well, what did she expect?' was very much in evidence from some, back in those days, just as it is still whispered today in some incidents. Puleeze! Tell that to the women worldwide who are swathed in all encompassing burqas, yet still fall prey to continual sexual abuse and worse. Repeat after me: Sexual assault or rape has NOTHING to do with sexuality. In any country, on any dark alley, it does have everything to do with intimidation, control and power.

Logan was truly lucky, both as a journalist and as a woman. For some, it would be all too easy to advocate that we just keep all women journalists away from dangerous foreign assignments, and figure that solves the safety issue for them. A fallacy, of course. I promise you, that at the same time she was under attack in Egypt, across Logan's own country there were maybe hundreds of women also being attacked, sexually assaulted, locked in their own private hells.

What Logan experienced is an every day reality for many women and girls, even in America, a so-called civilised society. Don't believe me? Read the stats. Horrifying, and even more so that this crime against women/girls is still rarely talked about openly, or in 'polite' society. Still in this 21st century, in America, some ignoramuses blame the woman. An easy way, I suppose, of abrogating our global responsibility to raise our boys AND girls in the values of respect and responsibility for themselves and for others, in every culture around the globe.

Does the fact that we know that what happened to Logan happens to millions around the world every day, make her attack any less brutal, unacceptable? Of course not!

But again: Logan was lucky. She lived. Make no mistake: her life, her world, and how she views that world, IS forever changed. I guarantee it. But I do believe that she can choose to embrace the positive from such a horrific event. It may take her a while to come to this, but there truly is much positive that can come out of that singular event for Logan. I am not for one minute suggesting that she shrink from her chosen profession as a foreign correspondent. Nevah! What I am suggesting is that, rather than have that one event define who she now is, and perhaps retreat to reporting on Women and Gardening, or some such other safe topic, she take the wisdom she gained from her time in Egypt and apply it in a positive way, to her professional and personal life. No, I won't break into Helen Reddy's song "I am Woman, Hear me Roar," (*phew*) but I know firsthand that the new knowledge Logan now has, can make her a far wiser journalist. Truly.

In what is now a totally new terrain for Logan, there will be many who will always see her as a victim. I will not, and it is my hope that she will reject that label/role absolutely. She will only be treated as a victim if she allows others to foist it upon her, or if she chooses to cloak herself in the victim mentality.

She is not a victim, despite how she felt that night in Egypt. She is a survivor, with a whole new perspective on the world around her. What she does with her new insights is - and must be - her choice. Even with the most supportive help/counselling, and with the love of family and friends surrounding her, I can assure Lara Logan, that night in Egypt will always remain a pivotal moment for her. It will always be a part of her; there will be no escaping that truth.

Lara Logan is in the privileged position of being able to choose what she does with what happened to her in Egypt. It is my sincere hope that she chooses to reclaim her life as her own to control, and not allow that mob - or anyone else - to forever define her as a 'victim.'

I wish for her only great happiness in her new reality. Lara Logan is so very lucky. She lived. And so did I. To me, that is the hugest victory - and yes, gift - to come out of such an event.


Saturday, February 26, 2011

On the cover of the Rolling Stone: Hastings aims at another General - the military fires back

Michael Hastings of Rolling Stone is at it again. Little punk Mikey, whose most recent claim to fame was writing a story on General Stanley McChrystal, decided to milk his 15 minutes of infamy, and has set his sights on yet another General, in this case LTG William Caldwell IV.

I really did try to read Mikey's latest breathless prose, but honestly? I just couldn't get past the first few paragraphs to know that, once again, this 'award-winning "journalist" is so intent on claiming another scalp, and yet more notoriety, he doesn't do his homework.

Fortunately, others in the military community did manage to read all of Hastings' latest, and they are firing back on all cylinders (or whatever the appropriate military metaphor is):

First out of the gate was War on Terror News:


Friday, February 25, 2011

Hastings Battles Generals on the Pages of Rolling Stone

LTG Caldwell When Michael Yon attacked Generals Menard and McChrystal, his readership soared. When Michael Hastings of Rolling Stone magazine published disparaging remarks by General McChrystal's staff, their hits peaked at 943,000 the day after, 600% of their norm. Their American readership soared from 100k to 753k that day. There's no telling how many copies of that issue were sold. The General was fired within hours for daring to note that the POTUS had hardly given him the time of day. Hastings got an award from his fellow journalists for taking down the General. Their online revenue likely hit 6x the norm as well.

So, it's little surprise, that Hastings and Rolling Stone have decided to try to replicate those numbers. This time, they're going after LTG Caldwell IV, and relying on hearsay and "he said, she said," with a zeal reminiscent of the Inquisition. He's aligned himself with an officer with a bone to pick: LTC Holmes (a married man) was investigated for inappropriate relations with a subordinate and evidently took issue with orders given him by the General, his boss. Hastings decided to get the hackles of Senators up, by implying they had been played.

But there are some things that don't add up in the LTC's story. He claims that his role is "PsyOps," but one insider has called him out on it. Evidently, the officer was assigned in an "Information Operations" (IO) role, and does not appear to be involved in a "psychological operations" position at all. There is a crucial distinction between the two, and an important truth. The US Army places a premium on Truth, so even when it conducts "PsyOps" against the enemy, it uses the truth in order to maintain believability in current and future operations of the kind. While IO is designed to get the truth publicized across the spectrum, psyops (now called MISO) is designed to be used against the enemy. It would be illegal and immoral for psyops to be used against Americans, even though it is still the truth. IO is important though, because the MSM is not getting the full story out. IO is designed to publicize the atrocities of the enemy and the good deeds of Our Own Troops, which seems to be the opposite of what the MSM wants to spotlight...[emphasis mine]...


WOTN has much more here, as they continue to dissect Hastings' contribution to 'truth' and the msm. WOTN presents facts - those pesky things that the msm generally, and Hastings' specifically here - choose to ignore.

A Soldier's Perspective is next, and CJ Grisham, currently serving in the US military, continues to educate peons like Mikey Hastings:

CJ Rolling Stone Targets Another General

February 25th, 2011 by CJ

Matt, from Blackfive, already beat me to writing this, so some of what I say may parrot what's already been written there. But, I know LTC Caldwell and I can't sit silent and let RS get away with stupidity.

Rolling Stone – I'm glad I ended my subscription YEARS ago – alleges that LTG William Caldwell violated laws and regulations by using "psychological operations" against American, specifically Senators and Congresscritters.

The list of targeted visitors was long, according to interviews with members of the IO team and internal documents obtained by Rolling Stone. Those singled out in the campaign included senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin; Rep. Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee; Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts.

The incident offers an indication of just how desperate the U.S. command in Afghanistan is to spin American civilian leaders into supporting an increasingly unpopular war.

[...]

Like Blackfive, I wouldn't be surprised if this LTC is out for vengeance and swinging wildly trying to pass the buck. I have worked and do work very closely with Psy-ops units for years and they all know the rules. Being in the military, I see exactly what is happening from this article, but the uninformed that have never served a day in uniform will assume the worst. [emphasis mine] I'm going to try and break this down allegation by allegation in the hopes that it makes sense. Some areas I CAN'T directly respond to by virtue of my access and duties and this is NOT an official response by any means – just my personal opinions based on experience. I will completely ignore those....

*Gasp*! 'Based on experience'????? CJ does go point by point, and Hastings would do well to read it here, before writing his next ' scoop.'

The BlackFive column CJ refers to?:


Posted By Blackfive • [February 25, 2011]

By now, you all have probably heard about or read this story from muckraker Michael Hastings about Lieutenant General Caldwell utilizing Psy-ops resources (personnel) in order to influence American politiicans - specifically some very key Senators.

...The list of targeted visitors was long, according to interviews with members of the IO team and internal documents obtained by Rolling Stone. Those singled out in the campaign included senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin; Rep. Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee; Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts...

Like Jack Reid and Joe Lieberman and Carl Levin are weak minded fools and LTC Holmes was going to use some kind of mind-kung-fu on them? Come on...

This whole article smells of a disgruntled Lieutenant Colonel who got caught breaking the rules (drinking alcohol, inappropriate relationship, etc.) and is now in full-on reprisal mode. ...



And yes, you know there is more - here - as yet another military veteran takes Hastings' to the woodshed, and continues his education. Hello, Mikey??? You detecting a theme here yet? May I *suggest* that you widen your list of sources before you rush to print? Hmmmm?

Not to be outdone, left out of the fun of pointing out the error of his ways to Mikey, (who is apparently a legendary 'military expert' in his own mind,) This Ain't Hell enters the fray, and attempts to contribute to Hastings' education:

Rolling Stone accuses Caldwell of using brainwave deathray on Congress

Yes, it’s actually news for the pot heads at the Rolling Stone that DoD tries to convince Congressmen to finance their projects. But, apparently the military has a secret mind-manipulation process that doesn’t work so well on detainees (see Tony Camerino posts) but is easily adapted to influencing congressmen...

[...]

Who did they target?

John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin; Rep. Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee; Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts.

Really? Al Franken? They could brainwash him with a used wet nap if they could find the BB-sized organ.

How much convincing would it take for McCain, Lieberman and Mullen? Aren’t they all pro-victory in the first place?

I wonder if Rolling Stone even suspects that they’ve just been the subjects of a counter-intelligence operation...

An informed analysis here. And yes, TAH has other columns up that I recommend that Hastings read.

Susan Katz Keating also has her 2 cents' worth to add:


Friday, February 25, 2011

Rolling Stone Journo to Get Nick Meo Award? Go, Team PsyOp!

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv_1MphnwXPx9CwIsFSQVrlWqBvfc3apJQ_9gHdgBjdXDIYoGHPfWq2MMmigPsSOmpSDdr9bXN6TyWaFxeQSXNJD2z_8d1K80lcJyDSFfiBeomcLLEdjrvQP7cIdDNU-706Y7OBkNr5Z4/s1600/WTF.jpg

[...]


Meanwhile, speaking of things that make you reach for the nice tall mug of Whiskey Tango Etcetera...

It appears as if Rolling Stone scribbler Michael Hastings has emerged as front runner in this year's Nick Meo Awards for Journalistic Rectumtude (uhhh... my Spellcheck is broken, so I may be a bit off on my wordsmithery, but you know what I'm trying to say).

Hastings is awesome. First, he wrote the article that likely was a reverse psyop allowing Gen. Stan McChrystal to bug out of Afghanistan. Now, Hastings has unearthed a secret project in the grand old tradition of MK Ultra and other covertness, aimed against... JSM himself, and other Senators! Or so he claims....


WTF indeed! SKK has much more to share with Hastings here. If you don't know who Nick Meo is, you have been reading in all the wrong places, and/or not paying attention. Google him.

All in all, I'd say Michael Hastings need to rethink his approach to serious journalism, that is if expects his 'work' to be taken seriously. Yet again, maybe not, since just these excerpts alone prove how inadequate he is, when set against REAL military experts.

As WOTN points out, for Hastings, Rolling Stone, and yes, most msm, any story is all about the ratings, readership, and by extension advertiser dollars. Based on just this one story alone, no reader looking for facts could/should look to pieces like Hastings' latest for truths. It surely isn't coincidence that while msm numbers continue a downward spiral, online blog sites' readership continues to climb.

It is all about credibility. Once again, Hastings proves that he is more than a tad short in that department. Once again, when it comes to military facts, stories, our military shows people like Hastings up for the inept tools that they are. Of course, I could suggest that Mikey Hastings get together with that other intrepid 'journalist' - Mikey Yon - and compare notes. They both seem to subscribe to the same school of journalism: never let the facts get in the way of a 'good' story.

Meanwhile, our real military experts continue to set the record straight. Pay attention, Mikey!

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Wartime Museum Announcement


From Susan Katz Keating:

TODAY at noon The Wartime Museum will make a major announcement. What could it possibly be? Concrete Bob will have the scoop in real time Tuesday at United Conservatives of Virginia!
http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/


And the Wartime Museum homepage? Here.